People / Faculty
Joshua Tenenbaum, Ph.D.
Professor of Computational Cognitive Science
Computational Cognitive Science
We study one of the most basic and distinctively human aspects of cognition: the ability to learn so much about the world, rapidly and flexibly. Given just a few relevant experiences, even young children can infer the meaning of a new word, the hidden properties of an object or substance, or the existence of a new causal relation or social rule. These inferences go far beyond the data given: after seeing three or four examples of "horses", a two-year-old will confidently judge whether any new entity is a horse or not, and she will be mostly correct, except for the occasional donkey or camel.
We want to understand these everyday inductive leaps in computational terms. What is the underlying logic that supports reliable generalization from so little data? What are its cognitive and neural mechanisms, and how can we build more powerful learning machines based on the same principles?
These questions demand a multidisciplinary approach. Our group's research combines computational modeling with behavioral experiments in adults and children. Our models make strong quantitative predictions about behavior, but more importantly, they attempt to explain why cognition works, by viewing it as an approximation to ideal statistical inference given the structure of natural tasks and environments. While our core interests are in human learning and reasoning, we also work actively in machine learning and artificial intelligence. These two programs are inseparable: bringing machine-learning algorithms closer to the capacities of human learning should lead to more powerful AI systems as well as more powerful theoretical paradigms for understanding human cognition.
Current research in our group explores the computational basis of many aspects of human cognition: learning concepts, judging similarity, inferring causal connections, forming perceptual representations, learning word meanings and syntactic principles in natural language, noticing coincidences and predicting the future, inferring the mental states of other people, and constructing intuitive theories of core domains, such as intuitive physics, psychology, biology, or social structure.
Perfors A, Tenenbaum JB, Wonnacott E. Variability, negative evidence, and the
acquisition of verb argument constructions. J Child Lang. 2010 Jun;37(3):607-42.
Epub 2010 Apr 6.
Kemp C, Tenenbaum JB, Niyogi S, Griffiths TL. A probabilistic model of theory
formation. Cognition. 2010 Feb;114(2):165-96. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB. Theory-based causal induction. Psychol Rev. 2009
Baker CL, Saxe R, Tenenbaum JB. Action understanding as inverse planning.
Cognition. 2009 Dec;113(3):329-49. Epub 2009 Sep 2.